Here's another of those long pdf files about a program.

My main point in posting this link is for folks to take a look at the project and its goals.... then consider if this is a project that those of us who love hunting should keep an eye on...

after reading it anyone can plainly see hunting is not among the thoughts of those who want this project to be a big success... and that WORRIES ME !!!!

It also shows how and why DCNR has to play both sides...
the hunting side when it comes to forest managment and the  non-hunting side when it comes to tourism....



http://www.dcnr.state.pa.us/info/pawilds/progressthroughpartnerships.pdf

Depends on the long term goals of those folks running the project.

Tony and Anna, two gringos from Rainforest Relief, come to Pangayacu to help with the ecotourism project. They help the Quichua build tourist cabins and a dining hall. They scout out trails for hikes through the rainforest. They train two of your neighbors to be guides, showing tourists around the community.

You and your neighbors are pleased with the work that Tony and Anna are doing. But Tony and Anna are interested in more than the tourist project. They want to help with everyday matters. They encourage people to conserve what rainforest is left. They ask people to stop hunting, because tourists like to see parrots and small animals in the forest. When your uncle Patricio clears half a hectare (one and a quarter acres) of primary forest and plants more maize in its place, Tony and Anna talk to him for a long time. The following week they come to the community meeting and propose a ban on forest-clearing and hunting. They say that the rainforest belongs to everyone in the world, and it isn't right for anyone to cut more of it down.

Many of your neighbors are angry after the meeting. Their land is theirs--it doesn't belong to some gringos in the United States. If ecotourism means giving up their rights to their land, they want nothing of it. These feelings are common among the Quichua of Pangayacu. Tony and Anna's plans are doomed. Another community meeting is called to resolve the situation.


There has been little change in land use. Currently about a third of all community land is primary rainforest.  
   Families are enjoying their extra income from tourism. At this rate, each household will make about $300 more this year than last year.

 

           


       

   

Just an example of what can happen. Ecotourism promotes non consumption and is often done on national parks where hunting is not allowed. There is a debate over when or if hunting is compatable with ecotourism. Some say yes, some say they can coexist, and many say it goes against the concept. We will have to see how it plays out.